The face of tort claimants, and the court to give up its online video mode's advice, Storm video still say "no."
Yesterday, The video of China's largest software maker crashed on the copyright lawsuit. According to municipal court announcement shows that the storm was sentenced to violations of the Kai video culture, "Love Master" domestic broadcast rights, be required to immediately stop online play service and compensate 30,000 yuan. Although the compensation is not much, but this is pure storm video video player software from the online video sharing platform transition after the experience of the first copyright lawsuit.
It is noteworthy that the attitude of Haidian court for the case. Page 11 of the Judgement of the Court has clearly said, "In view of this model there is a big legal risk, Storm Internet (Storm video production company name) should be adjusted." This is the first time the legal system for the Internet business model to targeted recommendations, highlighting the online video sharing mode with irreparable weakness. In the face of the court to persuade it to give up aspects of the behavior of online video mode, audio-visual aspects of storm-related public clearly said, "No, we will always adhere to the path of development aggregation platform."
Why would a business model aspects of the court to "admonish" and refused to get storm video and why it so strongly? It needs to return to the case itself from tort ... ... It is understood that the storm video video platform for its network of partners potatoes "love expert" to provide search and link services, and advertising in the player interface, net income and potatoes into . In the culture that the move violated Kay "love master" domestic copyright, then to the Beijing Haidian courts and claim 100,000 yuan. Beijing Haidian court after hearing that the storm broadcast video software platform, "Love Master" without the copyright owner, without payment of compensation, in violation of the right to information dissemination Kai culture, should stop infringement and compensation for loss of 30,000 yuan according to the law. This is the Storm launch video-sharing platform video copyright lawsuit the first encounter.
However, audio-visual aspects of this storm, said the storm was only audio and video content aggregation platform, not directly provide users with online video content, online video films are all partners Tudou, PPS and other networks and to provide emotional and stressed, "has yet to own servers and broadband. "
STORM is denied even though they have violations, but in July last year exposed Storm launch video online video sharing platform software, announced its entry into online video and cooperation in the field and into the video website advertising, the copyright risk to start high.
Online video sharing is the Internet video industry experienced the largest operating model of copyright litigation. At present, party activists intensified copyright cases, copyright disputes will be more and more, almost day by day appeal stage. Especially in the two months prior to the excited mesh and 80 copyright infringement lawsuits against potato network reached a peak, and almost all of the outcome of the proceedings are ended video sites losing compensation. Video website and copyright in the survival of the risk of pressure has become increasingly difficult to maintain a balance between.
The face of the video sharing industry, copyright litigation risk is so high, why insist on Storm video to launch its own video sharing platform for it? Analysts pointed out: "Storm path video go video sharing its purpose is to share the advertising revenue pie. Despite the storm video currently installed more than 1 million, but thanks to the traditional software model can no longer make money. The Internet-based software and services online technology to money is the industry consensus, as the general trend. Storm video online mode transition is forced by management. "Therefore, in order to better survive the storm video is not persuaded the court to abandon online mode.
In addition, Kay has been a lawyer present in 20 to be infringing on another video to continue to recover storm video. Message of being successful, another side of copyright owners about infringing on the 150 paragraphs discuss a video statement to the Storm video. It is reported that the agency has completed its evidence gathering. It appears that one foot into the online video copyright minefield of Storm video once again experiencing a "storm" of.
Recommended links:
HOW GIS abstract surface features of space?
PRD employment "upward", "Labor Shortage" moved to the Mainland
Programming Books From The ENTER_FRAME ActionScript3 Speaking
.avi to .mp4 converter
vob to Youtube
TD equipment manufacturers did not respond to rumors delivery schedule: now are on the right track
Hot Standby Knowledge
Easy to use Icons
Articles about Icons
Text Or Document Editors Catalogs
"Batman Arkham asylum" after playing a little bit of getting
Operators burn punched 11 million users four DRAMA success
The founding of sailing
Rising ON the horizon IPTV
H264 format
Youtube to mpg
No comments:
Post a Comment